Old Sails: A stylized Carrack from Portuguese Malacca

Here is one of my favorite ships.
   This one is small dime-sized coin (measuring 17mm and 2.2 grams) of tin and lead. It has no legend or date,  but it has been identified as a one dinheiro coin from the Portuguese colony at Malacca. The colony was located in Malaysia and was a major port along the spice-route.
   This colony was seized from the local shahs in about 1511, and it remained in Portuguese hands until 1641 when the Dutch East India Company took control. The colony was heavily fortified and was never safe, as it was surrounded by Islamic states that wanted to reassert themselves.
   This piece has been attributed to the reign of Sebastian of Portugal who ruled from 1557 to 1578.
   The ship appears to be a stylized carrack. Its symmetrical rendering fills the flan. Carracks are characterized by bold fore- and aft-castles. These features produce a U-shape where the middle section of the ship is lower at the gunwales. This feature is evident on the Portuguese coin. Also, it appears that the bow is facing right, as the fore-castle shows slanting line at its forward base.
   Carracks tended to have deep hulls suitable for carrying cargo -- this appears to be emphasized on this coin as well. Finally, two masts are seen: a large center mast with two stays and a small foremast. Both masts have yardarms at the top.
   Carracks were introduced by the Portuguese and Spanish in the late 13th century and were popular for the next two centuries in various forms. The early ships had two or three masts, whereas later (and larger) ships could have four masts. A combination of square and lateen sails were used.
   In contrast, cogs were used primarily in the North Sea and North Atlantic by nations in the Hanseatic League. Although the bold center mast is similar to those found on cogs, the attribution of this coin to Malacca in the mid-1500s strongly suggests that this ship is a carrack and not a cog.
   On a personal note, I like the simplicity of the design. It fills the face of the coin with just enough elements to tell its story. The guides used by the engraver are clearly evident: a large center dot and a circle lightly etched into the die face. The lines are hand-cut with enough irregularity to pull you in. There are no rims to protect the bold lines of the ship, adding to its primitive look. Finally, the patina on this particular coin is just right in my opinion: encrusted corrosion salts create a pleasing contrast.

Do like a Necromancer (Part 4): Create a Set

Whereas curiosity and caprice (plus a certain genotype) sets us off on the road to collecting, our motives are often channeled by the opinion of others.
   I am often asked by members of my local coin club -- where I am the Education Director -- to give a tutorial on collecting. More annoying, I am asked to share the secrets of investing. How unfortunate, I often think.
   There is no "proper" way to collect.
   There is, I suppose, a proper way to invest money in coins. But who cares? The necromancer collector does not care! Life is too short to ruin this fun hobby with money grubbing concerns or vain aspirations of heroism.
   Life is also too short to allow someone else to tell you how to enjoy collecting coins. To do so is like asking an expert how to enjoy ice cream. I can hear it now: "Always start with vanilla; and after a you get a few pints under your belt, then move to chocolate." "Oh, and remember to lick it with tip of your tongue not the flat section in the middle." Yea, right.

Is this it? Dates and mints?
Go further; get creative; give these dimes more to say!

   In coin collecting, we often start accumulating a few items here and there. An unusual cent catches our eye, or perhaps we impulse buy a token with a ship on it -- maybe even a ruddy old cob. In the beginning, we either started out collecting like children do (innocently without self-reproach), or as adults, we acted like children. Blissfully so, I might add. But eventually, most folks find and follow the well-trodden path, getting serious and losing some of that wonderment in the process.
   The coin folder indoctrinated us. The Red Book shaped us. We began paying attention to dates and mint-marks. We developed set completion goals. Eventually, we specialized in a series like Lincoln cents or Mercury dimes.
   And so it goes.
   We adopt a rational collecting plan in accordance with the archival traditions we have seen in those stodgy museums we visited in the 6th grade. We strive to assemble of string of coins, in order by date and mint. How exciting is that? Rows of Mercury dimes can lead to boredom and nagging questions about the meaning of it all.
   P-D-S, P-D-S ... Why do we need them all? Was there ever a cash register in a corner store that contained a complete date-mint run of Mercury dimes? Put another way, does a complete set of dimes really take you back to simpler times? Why not do something more creative? Why not create your own set.
   Now I have to concede that there is nothing wrong with traditional set collecting. Maybe you are studying them to explore how the series evolved. Maybe you are one of those collectors that has an obsessive-compulsive kink in the mid-brain, and you are desperate to get them all. Or perhaps it is all about keeping the hunt going. All these factors notwithstanding, my question to you is this: Did you consider other alternatives? Did you choose your own path?
   Creating sets is the hallmark of collector. Why choose the prepackaged approach? Do your own thing. Do you have to have the 1916-D? Maybe you do; maybe you don't. But the answer lies with you, not the experts, not the Red Book, not the folder.
   Consider this: If you discovered an old register bank full of coins and untouched since 1950, what would be in it? Now, this would be an interesting collection. Each coin would have to be selected for a reason. And yes, maybe you could spike it with a 1916-D -- but at least it would not be because a vacant hole in blue told you so.