I have revised this Chapter several times, so I updated all previous posts. I hate to say this, but you will want to go back and re-read the previous three posts if you want the full story: 1/29/17, 2/3/17, and 2/26/17. Some paragraphs have been re-arranged and many words changed (hopefully for the better). This is how writing goes: write, revise, revise, revise.
My book manuscript is written (but for one or two chapters), so the revision process is underway. Over a hundred references will be added in later -- whew!
And so, on with our story:
During the King’s
Touch ceremony, the afflicted person would use the copper ticket to gain admittance.
When called forward, the person kneeled before the King and was touched. A
bishop read Biblical passages from the Gospel of Mark during the service. One
verse in particular explained the immunity of kings to evil and the power to
heal: “They shall take up serpents; and if they drink any deadly thing, it
shall not hurt them; they shall lay hands on the sick, and they shall recover”
(Mark 16:18). At the conclusion of the service, the King hung the coin around
the neck of the afflicted.
While visiting
the British Isles in 1611, the Prince of Hesse made this observation. “I …
attended the ceremony of “touching” several scrofulous patients, two bishops
being also present; during the benediction the King laid two fingers upon them,
and hung around the neck of each an angel with a white silk ribbon.” I’m sure
that the service was a curious spectacle. The King’s Touch was unique to
England and France and must have intrigued foreign dignitaries like the Prince.
The primary
illness to be cured was a tubercular infection of the lymph nodes known as
Scrofula. It was a common ailment characterized by ugly purple swellings in the
neck and occasional outbreaks of oozing sores. The disease was called the
“King’s Evil” or “Morbus Regius” for its association with the touching ceremony.
Less often, folks with rheumatism, seizures, and fevers were admitted to the
service.
These illnesses
tended to follow a fluctuating course such that periodic remissions were
possible; hence, the King’s Touch appeared to be efficacious often enough to
generate remarkable success stories. Some physicians were no doubt skeptical,
as the king’s surgeon, John Knight, commented in the 1670s: “If I err, I err in
good company. Meanwhile the healings cheer the sick and serve the cause of the
king.” When relief was not forthcoming, it was attributed to divine providence;
I guess sinners – thieves, fornicators, murderers – had to pay a price.
The King’s Touch
service was usually performed twice a year on Michaelmas and Easter. Not all
monarchs were enthusiastic to touch. James I was notably squeamish about it,
and he wanted to end the practice for its Old Church associations. Yet, the services
continued. The populace clamored for it. Besides, the ceremony strengthened the
monarchy in the eyes of its subjects. At its height, Charles II touched over
92,000 souls between 1660 and 1685. And, James II continued the practice with
zest.
I will have some more in a few weeks ... (I hope you are enjoying the story).
No comments:
Post a Comment